I have almost 2000 rules, most to automatically filter into mailboxes. I have mail going back to 1994 currently at 3,880,090,729 bytes in 18,845 Files, 70 Folders.Įudora still has by far the most capable filtering I've found. Īs of a few days ago this is running on Windows 7 Ultimate in a 2006 era Lenovo 3000 N100 "value notebook" with a Core-Duo (not Core2) 1.6GHz, 3GB RAM, and a new 500GB 7200rpm disk. The heaviest lifting email client that I have is Eudora 7.1.0.9 paid-version but it is no longer sold. ![]() And as long as those are kept below 2GB it seems to be OK. As long as they use folders, this gets factored into a file per OE mailbox. I have clients using Outlook Express with obscene amounts of mail - pushing 8GB - mostly due to emailed pictures and videos. The archive feature that creates a new PST with the exact folder structure of the original and moves all messages not touched since a specified date is useful for managing this. It can be used for large email if you are diligent about keeping multiple PST files and managing their size. I am familiar with Outlook (in all versions now including 2010). I know I could theoretically forward all of it there, and back, but that approach doesn't make my boss very happy (email handling policies and similar). Post scriptum: I love but cannot use it for work. If it is portable, that would also be nice, but I can also live without it. The thing is, I would love to have them all in email client since I often go after some old mails (slow projects). ![]() Then I usually take the files, move them onto a dvd, delete all messages I can do without and start anew. I've noticed that 'standard' Outlook Express (with whose interface I've been very happy) gets awfully slow after a while. Large portion of mails I receive come with attachments (zip, rar, pdf, dwg, etc.) and within a month I usually have another 1,5-2Gb of new mail. What would be a good email client for handling large amounts of mail ? It is not currently accepting new answers or interactions.Īlthough the title sums it up nice, I'll repeat and explain. This question and its answers are locked because the question is off-topic but has historical significance.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |